A senior Finnish team with 75 combined years shipping enterprise software. We design, build, and operate AI-native systems — and we use the same AI in our own delivery, so the work lands in weeks, not quarters.
Same problem. Two timelines. Same deliverable scope. Same compliance bar. Different assumptions about what success looks like.
| Them | Us | |
|---|---|---|
| Ownership | Account managers. Juniors do the code. | Principals code. No handoff. |
| Pricing | Hours × rate × uncertainty. | Scoped outcomes. Paid discovery. |
| Timeline | Quarters. Status meetings. | Weeks. Running system every Friday. |
| Success | Deliverables accepted. | A live system your team uses Monday. |
We use the same agentic tooling in our own delivery — the reason engagements here land in weeks, not months. Every pillar ends at a running system your team uses on Monday.
Pain Your team is prototyping with prompts in a notebook. Nothing’s in production, and nobody trusts the output.
Products where LLMs sit at the core of the workflow, not bolted on. Retrieval-grounded, evaluated, observable, and cost-aware — ready for real customers and auditors.
Pain An ageing ERP and a brittle ESB nobody wants to touch — blocking every new idea and every new hire.
Strangler-fig migrations off legacy stacks into clean APIs and event streams your team can actually evolve. We’ve lived on the wrong side of this and know how to get off it.
Pain Humans retyping invoices, contracts, and forms into your systems every single day.
Pipelines that turn unstructured documents into structured data your business systems can act on. Peppol, Finvoice, and Finnish business-ID aware where it counts.
Pain Processes that burn a senior person’s week but aren’t complex enough to justify a hire.
Agentic automation of the back-office work that runs your business — approvals, reconciliations, routing, triage — with gates where humans still need to call it.
Not sure which door you come in at? Tell us the problem. We’ll tell you if any of the four applies — or if we’re not the right team for it.
The people who sell you the work are the people who write it. No account managers, no juniors left holding the bag after the contract is signed.
An engagement ends when something your team actually runs on Monday is in production — observable, testable, owned by you.
A senior core team ships it. When scope genuinely warrants more hands, we bring in specialists from a curated network — not a bench of juniors.
If we're not the right team for the problem, we say so on the first call and point you at someone who is. Better for you, better for us.
We reach for LLMs when they earn their place in the system. The rest of the time we use boring, well-understood tools on purpose.
We scope real work with a paid discovery sprint, not a free "proposal." You get a concrete plan in two weeks — and surprises after that are on us.
Real names and bios drop when the time is right. The decades behind each role are documented and on their way.
Designs and builds the integration backbone of every engagement — the ESB, APIs, and data flows that connect a client's existing systems to anything new we ship. The rare profile that can sit with a business owner and an engineering team in the same hour and keep both conversations honest.
Owns the technical spine end-to-end — cloud infrastructure, backend, integrations, DevOps, frontend — and leads the AI-native practice: agentic systems, LLM-powered automation, retrieval-grounded applications. Designs it, writes it, ships it.
Engineer since day one, operator for the last decade. Builds alongside the other two and owns how the work lands: scope, cadence, the honest conversation with the client. Long career scaling IT solutions across European operations — the one who turns a promising prototype into a system your team runs on Monday.
If it's a fit, we propose a paid discovery sprint and give you a real plan inside two weeks. If it isn't, you'll know immediately — and we'll often point you to someone who can.